A film review

I went to see "The Hunger Games" tonight, and I thought it very well done. Like most books made into movies it certainly wasn't perfect; to do so just isn't possible, because there is always more story and development in a 300-page novel than there is in a 2.5 hour movie. I was particularly taken with Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss; her portrayal is consistent with my own reading of the novel, and her performance is excellent. The one casting choice I do question is Josh Hutcherson, who is not quite the heartthrob-type I had pictured for his character, but his portrayal is loyal and I can appreciate the sense of realism he brings to the character. Though I did miss some development and found myself questioning (as usual) if the unread viewer would see the same story that I do, I found that I appreciated the choices made by the director. A movie is a different beast than a novel, and I try to treat it as such; although I have seen the film just once I feel comfortable calling it a success.

Jane Eyre 2011

It is always with some trepidation that I go to see films based on Victorian novels; I have a deep sentimental attachment to the subject, and I recognize that it is largely impossible for a filmmaker to portray everything that such a novel includes. However, I often find myself heeding the siren call of seeing some of my favorite characters brought to life, and this weekend I attended a showing of "Jane Eyre."

The film itself is artfully arranged, employing a variety of flashback techniques in an attempt to manage a very lengthy time line. Those unfamiliar with the novel may find themselves a bit lost at times, but anyone who knows Charlotte Bronte's classic story can easily follow the series of events as they are presented.

Visually, the film is stunning, while preserving historical accuracy; unlike so many directors who seek to "spice up" historical films by introducing visual and audio elements that are not period authentic (think the new "Dorian Gray" or "Vanity Fair"), Cary Fukunaga uses the natural elements of the film to create drama while presenting for the audience the world in which Jane Eyre (and Charlotte Bronte) would have moved.

Ultimately, though, a film of this kind often comes down to casting, and "Jane Eyre" delivers far more than I had hoped. Too often it seems that bombshells are favored for plain roles, but Mia Wasikowska proves to be a perfect Jane, alongside a fantastic Mr. Rochester (Michael Fassbender) and a delightful Mrs. Fairfax (Judi Dench). Visually, each of these actors fits the roles assigned, and they work to truly bring these characters to life. The viewer can well and truly see Bronte's characters come to life, and move through the superbly gothic tale with dignity and grace.

Is the film perfect? Certainly not - but I maintain that the task would be impossible for the genre and primary source, and would heartily encourage fans of Jane Eyre to see the films for themselves.